On Saturday, March 22, 2025, ABC7 News reported that a federal appellate judge from the 9th Circuit, Lawrence VanDyke, is facing criticism for releasing a YouTube video related to a Second Amendment case. The judge, appointed by former President Donald Trump, posted an 18-minute video in which he showcases various firearms while in his judicial robes and office.
In the video, VanDyke handles and disassembles multiple guns, asserting that visual demonstrations are more effective than verbal explanations. He stated that the purpose of the video was to illustrate how guns operate, particularly in light of a decision regarding California’s ban on magazines that hold more than ten rounds of ammunition.
VanDyke dissented from his colleagues’ ruling to uphold this ban, claiming that other judges lack a fundamental understanding of firearms. His actions have sparked significant backlash, with Judge Marsha Berzon, a fellow member of the 9th Circuit, describing the video as “wildly improper.”
Legal expert Steven Clark raised concerns about the implications of the video, indicating that VanDyke appointed himself as an expert in a case he is adjudicating, thereby compromising judicial impartiality. Clark emphasized that judges are expected to remain neutral and not introduce additional evidence or personal opinions into cases before them.
The video has led to discussions about potential conflicts of interest for the judge, particularly regarding Second Amendment rights. While Clark noted that VanDyke’s conduct was not illegal, he questioned whether it violated judicial ethics. He suggested that this incident might prompt changes in how judges conduct themselves in the future, as it raises important questions about the intersection of personal beliefs and professional responsibilities.
The 9th Circuit Court has chosen not to comment on the situation, and efforts to reach VanDyke for a response have been unsuccessful. Meanwhile, the judges in the case voted 7-4 in favor of California’s magazine ban.
Source: ABC7 News
