On Wednesday, March 19, 2025, conservative commentator and columnist Matt Margolis published an article on PJ Media titled “The Judge Who Blocked Trump’s Transgender Military Ban Is a Total Nutcase.” In this piece, Margolis critiques Judge Ana Reyes, who recently issued a preliminary injunction against the Department of Defense’s policies limiting transgender individuals’ ability to serve in the military.
Margolis emphasizes his belief that Judge Reyes is unfit for her position, stating, “Judge Reyes is clearly a nutcase who has no business being on the bench.” He argues that her ruling reflects a troubling trend of judicial activism, which he claims threatens military readiness and national security. He characterizes the 79-page memorandum accompanying her decision as lacking in legal rigor.
According to Margolis, Reyes’s ruling contradicts the executive order signed by former President Donald Trump in January 2025, which aimed to enforce military service requirements based on biological sex. He contends that Reyes’s interpretation of military policy is misguided, and he criticizes her for citing the musical “Hamilton” as part of her legal reasoning, suggesting that such references underscore her unprofessionalism.
The article also discusses a judicial misconduct complaint filed against Reyes by the Justice Department, which alleges inappropriate conduct during the hearing about the military ban. Margolis highlights that Reyes questioned the government’s position regarding biological sex, arguing that her statements reflect a misunderstanding of established biological principles. He notes that she claimed there are multiple biological sexes, citing intersex conditions as evidence, which he disputes by stating that these conditions are classified as disorders of sexual development.
During the hearing, Reyes reportedly challenged a Department of Justice attorney about religious beliefs, posing hypothetical questions about what Jesus would say regarding transgender individuals’ access to homeless shelters. According to the article, this line of questioning was inappropriate and further demonstrates her unfitness for the judiciary, as it placed the attorney in an uncomfortable position and showed a lack of decorum.
Margolis points out that Reyes was appointed by President Biden in 2023, suggesting that her appointment reflects a broader trend of installing judges who prioritize progressive ideals over legal principles. He warns that this trend poses a significant risk to judicial integrity and the rule of law.
In conclusion, Margolis’s article portrays Judge Reyes as an activist judge whose rulings and behavior are detrimental to the judicial system. He asserts that when judges begin to shape military policy based on personal biases and cultural references, it undermines the foundational principles of the judiciary.
Source: PJ Media
