On Thursday, May 21, 2026, The Indiana Lawyer reported that the Indiana Supreme Court suspended Lawrence County Judge John Plummer III for two months without pay following an investigation into his illegal marijuana use.

The suspension stems from a nearly yearlong inquiry by the Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualification, which accused Plummer of using marijuana and providing inconsistent information about his drug consumption.

The court’s decision, issued on Wednesday, May 20, 2026, details that Plummer used cannabis-infused gummies and vaped marijuana between February and May 2025. He reportedly acquired these substances from a family member who purchased them in Michigan and brought them to Indiana.

The issue escalated on April 30, 2025, when Plummer appeared visibly impaired and erratic at a county council meeting. During this meeting, he spoke extensively, exhibited pressured speech, and made remarks unrelated to the court-related budget discussions.

Following this incident, allegations of Plummer’s concerning behavior increased. On May 14, 2025, he disclosed his marijuana use to another judicial officer, prompting the Commission on Judicial Qualification to open its investigation in June 2025.

While testifying before the commission, Plummer provided conflicting accounts of his substance use. He has since acknowledged that his deposition testimony “reflected a materially inconsistent and incomplete account of his marijuana use during the relevant period.” Plummer has also agreed that his actions violated Indiana’s Code of Judicial Conduct.

Despite the seriousness of criminal actions, especially when committed by a judge, the court has permitted Plummer to return to the bench. This decision was influenced by several factors, including Plummer’s lack of prior attorney or judicial discipline and the fact that his substance use occurred during a period of “personal stress and instability.” The court also noted Plummer’s acceptance of responsibility for his conduct, albeit belatedly.

The Indiana Supreme Court stated, “We believe these factors point to [Plummer’s] ability to regain the public’s confidence.”

 

 

Source: The Indiana Lawyer