On Friday, April 11, 2025, TMZ reported that attorney Joe Tacopina criticized a judge involved in Wendy Williams’ conservatorship case for declaring that her career is over. Tacopina described the judge’s remarks as “outrageous” and expressed confidence that Williams would make a significant comeback once the ongoing legal battle concludes.
During an appearance on “TMZ Live,” Tacopina, who represents Williams, expressed concern over the judge’s comments, emphasizing that they were inappropriate to make in court and especially in front of Williams. He pointed out that New York judge Lisa Sokoloff lacks experience in the entertainment industry, raising questions about her authority to comment on Williams’ career prospects.
Tacopina voiced confusion over why such statements were made during a court hearing unrelated to Williams’ career. He asserted that, based on his discussions with her, Williams is as coherent and lucid as ever. He suggested that the judge’s remarks reveal a bias against Williams, adding that he would have strongly confronted the judge had he been present in court.
Sources close to the situation revealed that Sokoloff told Williams she had no chance of reviving her career, while also criticizing her family. These comments reportedly caused Williams significant emotional distress. The rationale behind the judge’s statements remains unclear, but they have sparked concern among Williams’ supporters.
In a related note, Tacopina discussed a gag order issued in the case, stating he had never encountered such an order in a guardianship situation before. He noted that gag orders are typically reserved for cases where public comments could influence a jury, which is not applicable here since the judge alone will render a decision. Tacopina argued that gag orders are often viewed as unconstitutional and frequently overturned, suggesting that the motivation behind Sokoloff’s order might be to penalize Williams and her legal team.
While Tacopina has not taken over the guardianship proceedings, he indicated his readiness to step in if necessary and is prepared to challenge the judge’s authority in the case.
Source: TMZ
