On Monday, August 4, 2025, Terry L. Foster filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Ohio Supreme Court, seeking relief from Judge Brendan J. Sheehan. The petition alleges that Judge Sheehan violated a remand order issued by the Eighth District Court of Appeals. Foster claims that his legal rights were infringed upon during his incarceration and asserts that the judge’s actions obstructed the administration of justice.
Foster, who is currently incarcerated, contends that he was wrongfully convicted in a case involving alleged domestic violence and a subsequent drive-by shooting. He argues that the trial court failed to adhere to the appellate court’s remand order, which directed the trial court to vacate charges against him. The petition states that Judge Sheehan, who oversees the administrative functions of the court, did not ensure that the remand order was executed properly, leading to further delays in Foster’s case.
According to the filed documents, Foster alleges that Judge Sheehan and other legal officials colluded to obstruct justice, resulting in his unlawful detention. The petition highlights several claims, including dereliction of duty, violation of civil rights, and judicial misconduct. It asserts that the actions taken by Judge Sheehan contributed to a lack of due process in Foster’s original trial, where he was purportedly subjected to court appearances while under heavy medication following surgical procedures.
The legal complaint details Foster’s medical condition, stating that he is a burn victim requiring urgent medical attention, which he claims has been denied during his incarceration. He emphasizes that the trial judge’s failure to comply with the appellate court’s directives has exacerbated his suffering and prolonged his wrongful imprisonment.
Foster’s petition also notes that the Ohio Constitution does not permit the Court of Common Pleas to review prior mandates issued by the Court of Appeals. He argues that the writ of mandamus is necessary to compel compliance with the appellate court’s orders. The petition references specific legal precedents that support the claim that the trial court must follow remand orders issued by higher courts.
A copy of the original filing can be found here.
