The New York Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics has issued Opinion 25-143, addressing the use of video-only security cameras in town and village courtrooms.
The opinion clarifies the procedure for justices seeking to install such cameras for security purposes, particularly in light of potential vulnerabilities like isolated public entrances and situations where court clerks work alone.
The committee emphasized that while a judge must always avoid impropriety and act to maintain public confidence in the judiciary, the primary issue lies in adhering to the established legal process. According to the opinion, any town or village justice who wishes to install video-only security cameras in their courtroom must obtain approval from the Chief Administrator of the Courts or their designee, as outlined in Part 29 of the relevant regulations. This process is designed to ensure that legal limitations and technical requirements are appropriately addressed.
The committee noted that this was their first inquiry from a town or village justice who welcomes video-only security cameras in their courtroom. The opinion refines prior guidance, stating that a judge does not need to formally register an objection to the cameras while seeking administrative permission under Part 29.
The committee underscored the importance of cooperation between judges and court officials in administering court business. The judge must respect and comply with the law.