On Saturday, October 5, 2024, NEA Report reported that concerns have been raised regarding the fitness of Doug Brimhall to serve as Circuit Judge following his recent misdemeanor plea deal. The Second Judicial District Prosecuting Attorney, Sonia F. Hagood, expressed her worries in a letter dated October 4, which was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.

In her correspondence, Hagood stated that she lacks confidence in Brimhall’s ability to embody the qualities of a fair and impartial judge. She cited his criminal conduct and actions following an incident on May 3, 2024, as reasons for her concerns. At that time, Brimhall was serving as a deputy prosecuting attorney under Hagood.

The letter marks the first public revelation of Hagood’s stance on Brimhall’s situation following his resignation from her office shortly after the incident. Brimhall resolved pending felony charges through a plea deal on September 19, resulting in a misdemeanor conviction. As part of the agreement, he received a 12-month suspended imposition of sentence, along with fines, fees, mandated anger management classes, and community service.

Despite his legal troubles, Brimhall has expressed his intention to assume the role of Circuit Judge. Following the plea deal, his attorney, Bill Stanley, issued a statement affirming Brimhall’s commitment to serving the community in his elected position.

In her letter, Hagood emphasized her responsibility to advocate for victims and to uphold the integrity of the judicial system. She asserted that both victims and defendants deserve a judiciary that is fair and impartial. Hagood’s concerns regarding Brimhall’s conduct prompted her to presume that there are complaints filed with the Judicial Discipline and Disability Committee (JDDC) and the Office of Professional Conduct. However, she noted a lack of clarity regarding any potential disciplinary actions or restrictions that Brimhall might face.

The JDDC has confirmed that it is investigating at least one complaint against Brimhall related to his arrest earlier this year. Hagood’s letter was also sent to Emily Abbott, the executive director of the JDDC, among others, as she made her case for the need for transparency and accountability.

Hagood further requested that if the court revisits the judicial plan, Brimhall should be excluded from presiding over any cases involving the Second Judicial District Prosecuting Attorney’s Office. She indicated that her office intends to file a motion to recuse in all cases that may come before him.

In conclusion, Hagood’s letter highlighted the importance of addressing the implications of Brimhall’s actions on the judicial district, asserting that remaining silent on the matter would be tantamount to complicity in his conduct.

 

 

Source: NEA Report