On Friday, June 6, 2025, the Detroit Free Press reported that a recent psychological evaluation deemed controversial Troy 52-4 District Judge Kirsten Nielsen Hartig “unsafe to practice” on the bench. This evaluation was part of a complaint filed against her by the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission, which cited her behavior in the courthouse. Although the findings of the psychological report were initially redacted, they have since become accessible in certain formats.
The Judicial Tenure Commission had requested that Judge Hartig undergo a psychological assessment in 2024. Initially, she declined to provide the results to the commission but eventually submitted them approximately six months later. The commission’s complaint outlines allegations that Hartig engaged in bullying behavior towards court staff and attempted to exert control over employees and departments outside her authority.
The 13-page complaint accuses Hartig of clashing with the Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office, improperly dismissing criminal cases, and failing to deliver a psychological examination report as mandated by the commission. It claims that between 2018 and 2023, Hartig fostered a hostile work environment characterized by disrespect and fear among court personnel.
Following these allegations, Troy Chief Judge Travis Reeds removed Hartig from handling felony cases in May. In response to the formal complaint, Judge Reeds stated that the Judicial Tenure Commission plays a crucial role in upholding judicial integrity. He emphasized the importance of accountability in maintaining public trust in the legal system, noting that further action may be warranted following the filing of the complaint.
The Judicial Tenure Commission intends to petition the Michigan Supreme Court to appoint a master to oversee a public hearing regarding the allegations against Hartig. The outcomes of this hearing could range from censure and suspension to removal from her position. The commission may also recommend no action, with the Supreme Court ultimately making the final determination.
Daniel Cherrin, a spokesperson for Judge Hartig, expressed that she respects the role of the Judicial Tenure Commission and is committed to engaging fully in the process. Cherrin asserted that the commission’s complaint is based on disputed claims and a flawed investigative process. Hartig, who has served on the bench for over a decade, looks forward to addressing the allegations and believes in the necessity of transparency and factual integrity in the judicial oversight process.
The complaint also details specific incidents, including an instance in September 2018, where Hartig allegedly berated probation supervisor Patti Bates and court administrator Dana O’Neal, accusing them of financial mismanagement. Another allegation from October 2019 mentions Hartig criticizing O’Neal for not responding to emails while she was attending a funeral.
As the situation unfolds, the actions of the Judicial Tenure Commission and the Michigan Supreme Court will be pivotal in determining the future of Judge Hartig’s judicial career.
Source: Detroit Free Press
