On Tuesday, November 19, 2024, Pele K. Bradford filed a complaint for writ of procedendo in the Ohio Supreme Court against multiple judges of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas. Bradford, who is currently incarcerated, alleges that the judges have unreasonably delayed ruling on his Motion to Vacate a Void Judgment in his case, State of Ohio v. Pele K. Bradford (Case No. B-0400169).
Bradford’s motion, which he claims contains valid jurisdictional arguments, seeks to address a judgment he asserts is void. He argues that the prolonged inability to reach a decision on this motion constitutes undue delay, warranting extraordinary relief. Bradford cites the precedent set in State ex rel. Kemper v. Beecher to emphasize the severity of his situation, stating that each day spent in custody represents a distinct legal violation.
In his complaint, Bradford requests that the Ohio Supreme Court issue a writ of procedendo, compelling the judges to proceed to judgment on his motion. He further seeks an order for the judges to cover the costs associated with his legal action and any additional relief the court deems appropriate.
Bradford’s filing includes a verification statement affirming the accuracy of the petition’s contents and a certificate of service confirming that copies of the documents were mailed to the Ohio Supreme Court Clerk and other relevant parties.
The case highlights ongoing issues within the judicial process regarding timely resolutions for defendants, particularly those who claim that existing judgments against them are invalid. As proceedings unfold, the Ohio Supreme Court will consider whether to grant Bradford’s request for relief.
A copy of the original filing can be found here.
